CS
Chirag Singhal's blog
Finance · 2 min read

P2P Directory Part 7: Performance Analysis — NPA, AUM, and Return Comparison Table

A head-to-head comparison of Indian P2P platforms based on key performance metrics. Comparing LenDenClub vs Faircent vs IndiaP2P vs Lendbox.

P2P Directory Part 7: Performance Analysis

Choosing a P2P platform based on “Target Returns” alone is a dangerous strategy. The real metric of success is the Net Return (Target Return minus NPA/Defaults).


📊 Comparison Table: Platform Metrics (May 2026)

PlatformAvg. Target ReturnEst. NPA RateAUM / ScaleIdeal For
IndiaP2P15% - 18%< 1.0%ModerateHigh Yield + Low Risk
LiquiLoans9% - 11%~2.5%Very HighConservative Investors
LenDenClub10% - 12%3.61% - 3.88%HighDiversification Seekers
Cashkumar11% - 14%0.00% (Biz)LowLiquidity (Short Tenure)
Faircent12% - 18%VariableHighPro/Manual Investors
Lendbox11% - 14%~9.75% (HY)ModerateRisk-Takers
1 Finance P2PUp to 16%0.00% (New)Very LowEarly Adopters
Rang De4% - 6%0.31%ModerateSocial Impact

📉 Understanding the “AUM vs. NPA” Trade-off

As platforms grow in AUM (Assets Under Management), they often have to loosen their credit filters to accommodate the massive inflow of capital. This is why you often see “Giants” with higher NPA rates (3-4%) compared to specialized boutique platforms (<1%).

Key Takeaways for 2026:

  1. NPA Transparency: Platforms like LenDenClub and IndiaP2P lead the industry by publishing monthly “Factsheets.” If a platform hides its NPA numbers, exercise extreme caution.
  2. The “Net” Math: If a platform offers 12% and has 4% NPA, your actual return is roughly 8% (minus fees and tax). Always calculate the net.
  3. The August 2024 Legacy: Post-RBI crackdown, platforms can no longer guarantee returns. Any platform still promising “Fixed 12%” is likely in violation of RBI guidelines or using deceptive marketing.

Next Part: Part 8: The Master List — The Exhaustive 50+ Platform Directory Registry

Share:
Bookmark

Comments

Related Posts